Optic pathway gliomas in adolescence--time to challenge treatment choices?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal management of optic pathway/hypothalamic glioma (OPHG) remains an ongoing challenge. Little is known about the natural history, management strategies, and outcomes in adolescents. Carboplatin-based chemotherapy is a useful modality in younger children, delaying radiation to their immature brains. National trials have focused on younger children and excluded adolescents from studies evaluating the role of chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective study describes clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes in adolescents (aged ≥ 10 years) with OPHG (diagnosis during 1990-2006). Progression-free survival was compared with that in a cohort of younger children (aged <10 years). RESULTS: Thirty-three adolescents (19 females, 6 with neurofibromatosis type 1) with OPHG were identified within 2 Canadian pediatric oncology institutions. The majority presented with visual symptoms (82%). More than 55% (18 of 33) involved the posterior tract and/or hypothalamus (modified Dodge classification 3/4). Seventeen were initially observed; 8 remained progression free. Of the 25 of 33 adolescents who required active treatment, 9 (36%) needed second-line therapy. The progression-free survival for any first active treatment at age <10 years (52 of 102) or ≥ 10 years (25 of 33) was similar (46.9 vs 46.8 months; P = .60). In those who received chemotherapy as first-line treatment or after prior nonchemotherapy treatment failure, the progression-free survival trend was superior (62.9 vs 38.9 months) in those aged ≥ 10 years although not statistically significant (P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy is a valuable treatment modality for the achievement of disease control even in adolescents; their progression-free survival compares favorably with that in younger children. We propose that chemotherapy be considered as a first-line modality in adolescents, avoiding potential radiation-associated morbidities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".