MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113986781 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.907699

Impact of an Improved Combination of Signals From Array Coils in Diffusion Tensor Imaging

2007· article· en· W2113986781 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Gilbert, Dany Simard, G. Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsDiffusion MRINoise (video)Tensor (intrinsic definition)ComputationNoise reductionSIGNAL (programming language)DiffusionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Anisotropic diffusionReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematicsAnisotropyComputer sciencePhysicsOpticsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Magnetic resonance imagingGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved method for the combination of signals from array coils is presented as a way to reduce the influence of the noise floor on the estimation of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters. By an optimized combination of signals from the array channels and complex averaging of measurements, this method leads to a significant reduction of the noise bias. This combination algorithm allows computation of accurate tensors by using the simple two point method and is shown to provide results similar to the ones obtained using the standard signal combination and a nonlinear regression method with noise parameter estimation. In many applications, the use of this combination method would result in a scan time reduction in comparison to the current standard. The effects of the improved combination on diffusion decay curves, fractional anisotropy maps, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) profiles are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207