MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114126343 · doi:10.15537/1658-3175.5876

Propylene glycol allergic contact dermatitis: A quick reference guide for propylene glycol-free topical corticosteroids in Saudi Arabia

2013· article· en· W2114126343 on OpenAlex
Mohammed I. AlJasser, Ibrahim Al-Omair

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Medical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLotionMedicineDermatologyActive ingredientAllergic contact dermatitisAllergyTraditional medicinePharmacologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P glycol (PG) is a chemical used in many products as a solvent, vehicle, humectant, or emulsifier.1 Propylene glycol was found to be the most common cutaneous allergen in topical corticosteroids (CS).2 Cosensitization to PG and topical CS can occur,3 making it challenging to choose the appropriate topical CS in a PG-allergic patient. We recently published an article discussing PG-free topical CS in Canada.4 The aim of the present article is to provide a guide for dermatologists and non-dermatologists in Saudi Arabia to choose the appropriate topical corticosteroid in patients allergic to PG. Between August 2012 and July 2013, we carefully searched the ingredients of all topical CS (including the different available formulations) commercially available in Saudi Arabia using the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) database and package inserts. Topical CS that contained other active ingredients (for example salicylic acid) were excluded. If a formulation of the same product was listed more than once as different package sizes (for example 30 g cream and 15 g cream), this was counted as one product. A total of 85 topical CS products were identified in the SFDA database. The PG content of 30 (35%) products was unknown due to lack of information regarding the inactive ingredients. Of the remaining 55 products, PG was present in 26 (31% of the total number of products identified). The formulations of the PG-containing topical CS were as follows: 15 creams, 10 ointments, and one lotion. Twenty-nine (34%) of the commercially available topical CS were PG-free. We created a chart containing all the 29 PG-free topical CS available in Saudi Arabia sorted on the basis of their potency and structural class (Table 1). Cutaneous reactions to PG are mostly irritant in nature, but true allergic sensitization does occur. It is challenging to clinically differentiate between irritant and allergic reactions to PG; however, irritant reactions are generally more common, less vesicular, and tend to be associated more with burning sensation than pruritus as compared with allergic reactions. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) secondary to PG was found to be low (3.5%) by patch

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it