MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114144953 · doi:10.1017/s0024282906005950

Phylogenetic position of a Pacific Northwest North American endemic cyanolichen, <b><i>Nephroma occultum</i></b> (Ascomycota, <b><i>Peltigerales</i></b>)

2006· article· en· W2114144953 on OpenAlexaff
Michele D. Piercey‐Normore, Darwyn Coxson, Trevor Goward, Bernard Goffinet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lichenologist · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyInternal transcribed spacerPhylogenetic treeCladeEcologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nephroma occultum is a COSEWIC listed cyanolichen of “Special Concern”. It is endemic to old-growth cedar-hemlock forests in western North America. This is the first study to place N. occultum into a phylogenetic framework using nucleotide sequence and secondary structure data. It also addresses the phylogenetic relationship between N. occultum and N. arcticum. Analysis of fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) produced four major clades. The cyanobacterial transfer RNALeu intron (tRNALeu) from N. occultum was separated from that of N. isidiosum and fell between the Eurasian and North American epiphytic taxa. Examination of length and complexity of the folded secondary structures revealed different trends in the ITS1 and ITS2 rRNA regions. Even though N. occultum is endemic to North America, it seems more closely related to South American temperate rainforest species than to the sympatric N. arcticum. Nephroma occultum is alone among the studied species of Peltigerales in having an exceptionally long ITS1 region, and a different tRNALeu intron DNA sequence of the photobiont suggesting association with a unique genotype of Nostoc. It may be argued that the fitness of N. occultum may be influenced by the complex ITS1 RNA structure, a unique photobiont genotype undergoing a genetic bottleneck, no sexual reproduction to generate variation, and the inability to associate with different photobionts to adapt to changing habitats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LichenologistSame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207