Structural Studies on Hydrogen‐Bonding Receptors for Barbiturate Guests That Use Metal Ions as Allosteric Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Receptor 1 was designed to bind barbiturate substrates through a six‐point hydrogen‐bonding motif only in the absence of metal allosteric cofactors. It was predicted that the binding of metal ions by bipyridine ligands in 1 would result in a geometric change in the receptor to inhibit substrate recognition. However, receptor 1 showed minimal affinity for the barbiturate guests even in the absence of the metal. Binding studies on model compounds 2 , 3 , 5 , and 6 revealed that the inactivity of 1 is due to an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the N−H donor groups and the nitrogen atoms on the first heterocycle of the bipyridine ligands. This intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding was eliminated by altering the position of the tether between the bipyridine ligands and the active site to produce receptor 7 . Consequently, the high affinity exhibited by 7 for the barbiturate substrate ( K a = 2.8±0.7 × 10 3 M −1 in 9:1 CD 2 Cl 2 /CD 3 CN) was significantly reduced by the addition of Zn II ions as a negative allosteric co‐factor. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2004)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".