MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114185243

Gonadal Maturation and Histological Observations of Epinephelus areolatus and Lethrinus nebulosus in Halaieb/Shalatien Area "Red Sea", Egypt

2009· article· en· W2114185243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hatem H. Mahmoud

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Veterinaria · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerranidaeGonadosomatic IndexEpinephelusBiologyGrouperFisheryZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>Population
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epinephelus areolatus and Lethrinus nebulosus are the highly abundant species in the two dominant families (Serranidae and Lethrinidae) in Halaieb/Shalatien area. The objective of the present study is to describe the phases of gonadal development and determine the spawning season of the two mentioned species. Results showed that E. areolatus attains first sexual maturity at 22.8 cm (Total Length) for males and 23.5 cm for females while L. nebulosus attains it at 25.1 cm for males and 26.2 cm for females both after their second year of life. The gonadosomatic index indicated that, the spawning season of E. areolatus was in May and June and it was in June and July for L. nebulosus. The different stages of oogenetic development were examined microscopically. It was concluded that, six stages for oocyte developments of the two species under study were identified. Fish samples were collected monthly from the city of Shalatien landing center which is considered as the main Gonads were prepared for the histological landing center in the area of study. Gutted weights to the examination by fixing the gonads in buffered nearest gram and gonads weights to the nearest milligram formaldehyde. They were dehydrated in graded alcohol of both sexes of the two species under study were series, exposed to Xylol and embedded in paraffin wax. recorded for a total of 432 fish. The gonadosomatic index Sections from 4 to 7 µm thick were prepared from the was calculated for all the specimens as a percentage of middle parts of the gonads. The sections were stained gonad weight to the gutted fish weight as shown in with Hematoxilin and Eosin (2), then mounted in Canada following equation: balsam and photographed with an Olympus CX41 digital

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal VeterinariaSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207