MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114232665 · doi:10.18438/b8sg8r

An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC)

2010· article· en· W2114232665 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessie McGowan, Margaret Sampson, Carol Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence Based Library and Information Practice · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPublishing and Scholarly Communication
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMedical Library Association
KeywordsChecklistComputer sciencePeer reviewInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebLibrary sciencePsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstract.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.324
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.554
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3240.554
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.011
Bibliometrics0.0290.019
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0120.008
Research integrity0.0130.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations205
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence Based Library and Information PracticeSame topicPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationFrench-language works237,207