Rigidity effect of the dithioether spacer on the size of the luminescent cluster (Cu<sub>2</sub>I<sub>2</sub>)<sub>n</sub>(n = 2, 3) in their coordination polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of CuI with the flexible PhS(CH(2))(4)SPh dithioether ligand in MeCN solution affords the strongly luminescent metal-organic 2D coordination polymer [Cu(4)I(4){mu-PhS(CH(2))(4)SPh}(2)](n) (). The interpenetrated 2D network of is built upon by Cu(4)(mu(3)-I)(4) cubane-like clusters as secondary building units (SBUs), which are interconnected via bridging 1,4-bis(phenylthio)butane ligands. In contrast, the auto-assembly reaction of the unsaturated semi-flexible PhSCH(2)C[triple bond, length as m-dash]CCH(2)SPh ligand with CuI results in formation of the 3D metallopolymer [(Cu(6)I(6)){mu-PhSCH(2)C[triple bond, length as m-dash]CCH(2)SPh}(3)](n) (). The SBUs of luminescent consist of discrete Cu(6)(mu(3)-I)(6) hexagon prisms, which are coordinated with bridging 1,4-bis(phenythio)butyne ligands via Cu-S bonds. Contrary to the other rare literature-known examples of metallopolymers incorporating Cu(6)X(6) SBUs as connecting nodes, the CuCu interactions of [2.8484(6) A] are markedly shorter, being close to the sum of the Van der Waals radii of two Cu atoms ( approximately 2.8 A). The photophysics of these compounds, which exhibit reversible luminescence thermochromism, has been investigated in detail. The solid-state luminescence spectra of and feature at room temperature intense emissions around 560 and 555 nm, respectively. The luminescence properties of the unusual Cu(6)(mu(3)-I)(6) hexagon prism motif are rationalized by means of DFT and TDDFT computations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".