In vitro and in vivo studies of neutral cyclometallated complexes against murine leukæmias
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclometallated µ-halogeno dimers derived from nitrogen donor ligands (1-phenylpyrazoles, 2-phenylpyridine, and 1-(2′-pyridyl)indole) were treated with unidentate nitrogen and phosphorus donor ligands to give a series of neutral monomeric palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes. An initial prescreen of the complexes against the mouse lymphoid leukæmia cell line L1210 indicated that the complexes exhibited growth inhibitory activity over a relatively wide concentration range. Two factors that gave rise to increased activity were steric hindrance about the metal centre resulting from hindered ligands such as 2,6-dimethylpyridine, or the presence of a phosphorus donor ligand. Little correlation between palladium and platinum complexes was noted. Four complexes were selected for further in vivo study and, while none of the palladium complexes showed more than marginal activity against P388 leukæmia at doses below toxic levels, one platinum complex with a hindered metal centre did display significant antitumour activity against this model.Key words: cyclometallation, palladium, platinum, cytotoxicity, anticancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it