MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114306003 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2011.74

Dynamic Mud Deposition In A Tidal Environment: The Record of Fluid-Mud Deposition In the Cretaceous Bluesky Formation, Alberta, Canada

2011· article· en· W2114306003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersShell Canada
KeywordsGeologyDeposition (geology)CretaceousGeochemistryOceanographyPaleontologySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Mudstone layers in the tide-dominated Bluesky Formation (i.e., the “mud drapes”) have enormously variable sedimentary characteristics: they range from 0.1to 20 cm thick, can be homogeneous or internally stratified, and can have sharp or gradational upper and lower contacts. Based on recent flume studies, this diversity is interpreted to reflect the wide range of suspended-sediment concentrations (SSC; < 1 g L−1 to > 100 g L−1) and flow velocities (slack water to several meters per second) that are typical in tidal environments. Four recurring mudstone types are present, each of which is interpreted to have formed under distinct depositional conditions: (1) unstratified mudstone Type 1 (UM1): “classic” mud drapes generated by slow settling from suspensions with SSC values less than 1 g L−1; (2) stratified mudstone Type 1 (SM1): cross-stratified mudstone layers deposited by turbulent or transitional turbulent flows with appreciable current speeds (> 0.2 ms−1) and moderate SSCs (1–10 g L−1); (3) stratified mudstone Type 2 (SM2): horizontally laminated mudstone layers formed under conditions of transitional plug flow with moderate to high SSCs (1–100 g L−1) and appreciable currents (> 0.2 ms−1); and (4) unstratified mudstone Type 2 (UM2): thick mudstone laminae and beds (> 2 mm thick), with no internal lamination and common soft-sediment deformation, deposited by unstable plug flow or quasi-laminar plug flow, with moderate to high SSCs (1–1000 g L−1) and current speeds ranging from slack water to 1–2 ms−1. UM2 and SM2 mudstone types are equivalent to what recent studies have interpreted as the lithified product of fluid mud and may have been deposited dynamically, under current speeds above the threshold of mud erosion in clear-water flows. This indicates that, in high-SSC settings, “mud drapes” could form over significant portions of the tidal cycle (i.e., not only at slack water) and perhaps continuously over multiple tidal cycles if fluid-mud layers persist. Thus, tidal rhythmites might be poorly developed in areas with high SSC values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it