Particle capture efficiency of different-aged needles of Norway spruce under moderate and severe drought
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trees can remove particulate matter from the atmosphere, improving air quality and providing ecosystem services. Particle removal capacity is known to differ between tree species, but the influence of environmental factors on the removal capacity is still unclear. In this study, we measured particle capture efficiency (Cp) of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in wind tunnel experiments under three watering treatments (well watered, moderate drought, and severe drought) and determined needle characteristics (stomatal conductance and density, wax condition, and needle area) that affect particle uptake. Trees were exposed in the wind tunnel to 0.7 μm (geometric mean diameter) NaCl particles with a mass concentration of 1 mg·m −3 , and the Cp of the tree was determined for the current-year (C) and previous-year (C+1) needles. Overall, the Cp was significantly higher for C+1 needles than for C needles for all watering treatments. There was also a trend for higher Cp of C+1 needles of less watered trees, but this was not observed for C needles. We suggest that greater erosion of the wax layer of C+1 needles compared with C needles increases hydrophilicity of the C+1 needle surface and this, in interaction with low stomatal conductance, led to the higher Cp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it