Niobium and Aluminum Josephson Junctions Fabricated with a Damascene CMP Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on the fabrication of Josephson junction and superconducting bridges using a damascene CMP process applied for a first time to superconductors. The demonstrated industrial reliability of damascene CMP processes on large scale semiconductor circuits is a major incentive for our research that should allow large numbers of nanometric Josephson junctions to be fabricated in both Nb and Al, the two main material employed in superconducting quantum computing (qubit) and RSFQ electronics fabrication.We carried out a Chemical-Mechanical Polishing (CMP) process on Nb and Al films deposited on a SiO2 layer patterned with trenches of 100 to 300 nm of nominal depth. The process formed long bridges, 1 to 4 μm wide. The susceptibility and resistive transitions showed that CMP has no observable influence on superconductivity.We have also developed a hybrid technique that uses Al/Al2O3/Al shadow evaporation in the trenches before the damascene CMP process. This allows for high quality “in-situ” junction oxidation with the size reduction benefit provided by the damascene CMP process. We easily reach junctions sizes near 0.5 μm2 which are difficult to fabricate by other methods.We describe these techniques and report on measurements on large bridges and junctions and on the fabrication and measurements of Al and Nb nanobridges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it