Gene expression in the developing diaphragm: significance for congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a frequently occurring birth defect and a source of potentially fatal neonatal respiratory distress. Recently, through the application of detailed karyotyping methods, several CDH-critical regions within the human genome have been identified. These regions typically contain several genes. Here we focused on genes from 15q26, the best-characterized CDH-critical region, as well as FOG2 and GATA4, genes singled out from CDH-critical regions at 8q22-8q23 and 8p23.1, respectively. We tested the hypothesis that these putative CDH-related genes are expressed within the developing diaphragm at the time of the hypothesized initial defect. Our results show that 15q26 contains a cluster of genes that are expressed in the developing rodent diaphragm, consistent with an association between deletions in this region and CDH. We then examined the protein expression pattern of positively identified genes within the developing diaphragm. Two major themes emerged. First, those factors strongly associated with CDH are expressed only in the nonmuscular, mesenchymal component of the diaphragm, supporting the hypothesis that CDH has its origins in a mesenchymal defect. Second, these factors are all coexpressed in the same cells. This suggests that cases of CDH with unique genetic etiology may lead to a common defect in these cells and supports the hypothesis that these factors may be members of a common pathway. This study is the first to provide a detailed examination of how genes associated with CDH are expressed in the developing diaphragm and provides an important foundation for understanding how the deletion of specific genes may contribute to abnormal diaphragm formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".