MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Political Villainy on the Modern Stage: Arabic Translations and Adaptations of William Shakespeare’s Richard III

2012· article· en· W2114502731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSwearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesRhetoricPoliticsRhetorical questionArabicArtLiteraturePhilosophyPolitical scienceLawLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following paper explores the rhetorical use of anaphora in William Shakespeare’s Richard III and its impact on the translation of western conceptions of political villains to an Arabic audience. The analysis examines the use of anaphora in Richard’s soliloquies and public speeches that show Richard’s skills in rhetoric aimed primarily at political deception. The Arabic translations and adaptations of the play for contemporary audiences, on the other hand, were received poorly because the Arab world perceives political villains differently. The study proposes that a new translation or an adaptation should be based on an awareness of the historical background and the linguistic differences particular to the Shakespearean play so as to approximate the English model of political villainy for modern Arabic audiences. Key words : Richard III ; Shakespearean play; William Shakespeare; Arabic; English play Resume Le document qui suit explore l’utilisation rhetorique de l’anaphore dans William Shakespeare, Le Richard III et son impact sur la traduction de conceptions occidentales de mechants politiques a un public arabe. L’analyse porte sur l’utilisation de l'anaphore dans soliloques de Richard et de discours publics qui montrent les competences de Richard dans la rhetorique vise principalement a la tromperie politique. Les traductions en arabe et des adaptations de la piece pour un public contemporain, d’autre part, ont ete recues mal parce que le monde arabe percoit mechants politiques differemment. L’etude propose que une nouvelle traduction ou une adaptation devrait etre basee sur une prise de conscience du contexte historique et les differences linguistiques notamment pour la piece de Shakespeare de facon a approcher le modele anglais de la vilenie politique moderne publics arabes. Mots cles : Richard III; Piece de Shakespeare; William Shakespeare; Arabe; Piece en anglais

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it