MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114509044 · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgv086

Identification of a common variant with potential pleiotropic effect on risk of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer

2015· review· en· W2114509044 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Khalili, Jian Gong, Hermann Brenner, Thomas R. Austin, Carolyn M. Hutter, Yoshifumi Baba, John A. Baron, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bezieau, Bette J. Caan, Peter T. Campbell, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Constance Chen, Li Hsu, Shuo Jiao, David V. Conti, David Duggan, Charles S. Fuchs, Manish Gala, Steven Gallinger, Robert W. Haile, Tabitha A. Harrison, Richard B. Hayes, Aditi Hazra, Brian E. Henderson, C.A. Haiman, Michael Hoffmeister, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins, Laurence N. Kolonel, Sébastien Küry, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Loı̈c Le Marchand, Mathieu Lemire, Noralane M. Lindor, Jing Ma, JoAnn E. Manson, Teppei Morikawa, Hongmei Nan, Kimmie Ng, Polly A. Newcomb, Reiko Nishihara, John D. Potter, Conghui Qu, Robert Schoen, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Daniela Seminara, Darin Taverna, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Jean Wactawski‐Wende, Emily White, Kana Wu, Brent W. Zanke, Graham Casey, Thomas J. Hudson, Peter Kraft, Ulrike Peters, Martha L. Slattery, Shuji Ogino, Andrew T. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchToronto General HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseColorectal cancerMedicineInternal medicineIdentification (biology)DiseaseGastroenterologyCancerOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have separately identified many genetic susceptibility loci for ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and colorectal cancer (CRC), there has been no large-scale examination for pleiotropy, or shared genetic susceptibility, for these conditions. We used logistic regression modeling to examine the associations of 181 UC and CD susceptibility variants previously identified by GWAS with risk of CRC using data from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and the Colon Cancer Family Registry. We also examined associations of significant variants with clinical and molecular characteristics in a subset of the studies. Among 11794 CRC cases and 14190 controls, rs11676348, the susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for UC, was significantly associated with reduced risk of CRC (P = 7E-05). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of CRC with each copy of the T allele was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.96). The association of the SNP with risk of CRC differed according to mucinous histological features (P heterogeneity = 0.008). In addition, the (T) allele was associated with lower risk of tumors with Crohn's-like reaction but not tumors without such immune infiltrate (P heterogeneity = 0.02) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) but not microsatellite stable or MSI-low tumors (P heterogeneity = 0.03). The minor allele (T) in SNP rs11676348, located downstream from CXCR2 that has been implicated in CRC progression, is associated with a lower risk of CRC, particularly tumors with a mucinous component, Crohn's-like reaction and MSI-high. Our findings offer the promise of risk stratification of inflammatory bowel disease patients for complications such as CRC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207