MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114558262 · doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.323759

La buserelina en programas de superovulación para transferencia de embriones

2016· article· es· W2114558262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dora C. Suárez, María T. Gaviria, Carlos J. Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen El objetivo de éste trabajo fue comparar la respuesta superovulatoria y la cantidad y calidad de embriones recuperados en vacas Holstein en la Sabana de Bogotá, mediante la aplicación de buserelina en el día 6 del ciclo estral, antes de iniciar el esquema de superovulación . El trabajo se realizó en la Sabana de Bogotá, a 2640 msnm y una temperatura promedio de 12° C. Se emplearon veinte bovinos hembra de la raza Holstein a los cuales se les aplicó FSH (Vetrepharm Inc, Ontario,Canadá) para inducir superovulación, en los dias 11, 12 13 y 14 del ciclo estral, con una dosis total de 20 cc, y PGF 2ª (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) con la última dosis de FSH, 3 cc im. A diez de ellas (grupo tratamiento) se les aplicó Buserelina (Hoechst Roussel Vet, München, Alemania) en el día 6 del ciclo estral, antes de iniciar el tratamiento superovulatorio. Las diez vacas restantes se consideraron como grupo control. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que hubo diferencia significativa entre el grupo tratamiento y el grupo control respecto a la respuesta superovulatoria (p < 0,05) No se encontró diferencia significativa en el número de embriones recuperados en ambos grupos (p > 0,05). Palabras clave: análogos de GnRH, folículo dominante, superovulación, vaca. Summary The aim of this work was to compare the superovulatory response and the quantity and quality of recovered embryos in Holstein cows at the Sabana de Bogotá, through the application of buserelin at day 6 of the oestrus cycle, before starting the superovulatory treatment. The work was performed at the Sabana de Bogotá, at 2640 mosl, with an average temperature of 12 °C. 20 female bovines of Holstein breed were injected with FSH (Vetrepharm Inc, Ontario, Canada) to induce superovulation at days 11,12,13,and 14 of oestrus cycle, using a total dose of 20 cc per cow, and 3 cc of PGF2a (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) with the last dose of FSH. Ten cows (treatment group) received buserelin (Hoechst Roussel Vet, München, Alemania) on day 6 of estrous cycle, before starting superovulatroy treatment. The remaining ten cows were considered as control group. The results show significative difference between treatment and control group regarding superovulatory response (p < 0,05). It was not found a significative difference between treatment and control group regarding the number of recovered embryos (p > 0,05). Key words: dominant follicle, GnRH analog, superovulation, cow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Colombiana de Ciencias PecuariasSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207