Metabolism of isorhynchophylline in rats detected by LC-MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This paper investigates the metabolic fate of isorhynchophylline (ISOR) as a main bioactive oxindole alkaloid in the traditional Chinese medicine. METHODS: After oral administration of ISOR to rats, plasma, bile, urine and feces were analyzed by LC-MS. Hydroxylation of ISOR and successive glucuronidation proceeded in vitro by incubation with rat liver microsomes. RESULTS: ISOR was identified in plasma, 11-hydroxyisorhynchophylline 11-O--D-glucuronide (MI1) and 10-hydroxyisorhynchophylline 10-O--D-glucuronide (MI2) in bile, and free 11-hydroxyisorhynchophylline (MI3) and 10-hydroxyisorhynchophylline (MI4) in urine and feces. Within 24 h, 71.6% of ISOR was excreted into the feces (in 20.0 g) and 13.8% into the urine (in 20.0 ml) of rats after oral administration of 37.5 mg/kg. Monitoring by LC-MS showed that 8.5% of ISOR was metabolized to MI3 and MI4 in a ratio of ca. 1:1. Specific inhibition of CYP isozymes indicated that CYP2D, CYP1A1/2 and CYP2C participate in ISOR hydroxylation. CONCLUSIONS: ISOR was involved in the circulatory system after oral administration. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) in rat liver microsomes played a key role in ISOR hydroxylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".