Measurement of phosphorus desorption from a spodic horizon using two different desorption methods and pH control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) desorption is a key process in understanding the P dynamics in the subsoil of poorly drained Spodosols of the lower coastal plain of the United States. Phosphorus desorption is the major mechanism which defines the labile pool of spodic horizon inorganic P. The objective of this study was to compare methods for determining P desorption isotherms. A sequential extraction method was compared to a dilution method, and the need for pH control within each method was evaluated. Results showed that the sequential extraction method released more P than the dilution method and that pH control during either method did not significantly alter the results. The estimated partition coefficients (Kd) from the sequential method were significantly lower than the dilution method, especially at the lower solution P concentrations. At these low soil solution P concentrations, the variability in estimated Kd values would have a significant influence on the uptake predicted by mechanistic computer models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".