MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114678653 · doi:10.1109/emb.2007.910272

Integrating an Image-Guided Robot with Intraoperative MRI

2008· review· en· W2114678653 on OpenAlexafffund
Garnette R. Sutherland, I. Latour, Alexander D. Greer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMicrosurgeryRobotRoboticsImage-guided surgeryHaptic technologyComputer scienceInstrumentation (computer programming)Interventional magnetic resonance imagingMedicineMedical physicsStereotaxyRobot end effectorArtificial intelligenceRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microsurgical techniques, together with the introduction of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), established the need and the environment for the integration of robotics with surgery. In this article, we summarize our experience with intraoperative MRI on 781 neurosurgical patients. Intraoperative MRI demonstrated unsuspected residual pathology in up to 20% of patients. To take full advantage of the imaging environment, an magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible image-guided robot capable of both microsurgery and stereotaxy was designed and constructed. Unique features of the system include the use of non-ferromagnetic materials, an end effector that actuates standard surgical instrumentation, automated tool exchange, and haptic feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations114
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology MagazineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207