Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical effects of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on the cornea and visual performance by the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). SETTING: Clinique d'Ophtalmologie IRIS, Laval, Quebec, Canada. METHODS: Thirty-four patients aged 18 to 50 years volunteered for this prospective study. All patients had bilateral LASIK to correct myopia between -1.00 and -6.75 diopters (D) and refractive astigmatism less than 2.50 D. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error in the 68 eyes was -3.93 D +/- 1.67 (SD). A Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb) and a Technolas 217C excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb) driven by the PlanoScan program were used. The monocular CSF for spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) for both day and night vision simulations were made with a CSV-1000E system (Vector Vision) before and 1 month and up to 9 months after LASIK. All patients wore their best spectacle correction for the baseline CSF. RESULTS: The group (n = 68) averaged preoperative and postoperative CSFs did not differ at 1 month (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P>.05). In a subgroup of 11 eyes that had corneal microstriae, however, there was a significant reduction in the photopic and mesopic CSF at 6, 12, and 18 cpd (ANOVA, P<.05) despite normal Snellen visual acuities. The CSF normalized in 6 to 9 months as the microstriae became less visible. CONCLUSIONS: Subtle central corneal microstriae after LASIK can reduce the baseline CSF at medium to high spatial frequencies even with 20/20 visual acuity. The CSF normalizes as the microstriae fade over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".