MDM2 Promoter Polymorphism and Pancreatic Cancer Risk and Prognosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The mouse double minute 2 homologue (MDM2) -309T/G promoter polymorphism has been associated recently with the development and prognosis of a variety of tumors. The G allele is associated with increased affinity for Sp1 binding and higher MDM2 mRNA and protein levels, leading to diminished tumor suppressor activity of the p53 pathway. We hypothesized that the G allele is also associated with increased risk and worse outcome in pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated the association between MDM2 309T/G and the risk of histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma at Massachusetts General Hospital using unconditional logistic regression (123 cases and 372 controls). Complete overall survival and progression-free survival data were also available for 109 newly diagnosed patients. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of pancreatic cancer associated with the MDM2 T/G and G/G genotypes compared with TT were 1.89 (1.20-2.99) and 2.07 (1.03-4.16), respectively (adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, and pack-years of smoking). In Cox proportional hazards model with the wild-type T/T genotype as the reference category and adjusting for stage, treatment, and performance status, both the heterozygous T/G and the homozygous G/G genotypes were associated with decreased progression-free survival [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.67 (0.98-2.84) for T/G and 2.28 (1.11-4.71) for G/G] and overall survival [2.64 (1.23-5.67) for T/G and 3.12 (1.22-7.91) for G/G]. CONCLUSIONS: The G allele of the MDM2 -309T/G polymorphism is associated with 2- to 3-fold increase risk and progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a corresponding decrease in survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".