MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114758088 · doi:10.1139/x00-204

Some physiological properties of <i>Cryptomeria japonica</i> leaves from Kanto, Japan: potential factors causing tree decline

2001· article· en· W2114758088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takejiro Takamatsu, Hiroyuki Sase, J. Takada

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptomeriaJaponicaEpicuticular waxTranspirationHorticultureBotanyWaxBiologyChemistryPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) has been declining in urban areas of Japan. We examined if the decline was associated with physiological deterioration of leaves and resulting water stress. Leaves from three locations (severe decline, slight decline, and healthy) were analyzed for minimum transpiration rates (MT), amounts of epicuticular wax (EW), contact angles (CA), fractions of unhealthy stomata (US), cuticular thickness, and leaching of elements (LE). Anthropogenic elements (e.g., antimony (Sb)) in aerosols on the leaves were also analyzed by neutron activation analysis. MT, US, and amounts of Sb were 2, 15, and 10 times greater, respectively, at the severe decline location compared with the healthy location. LE was also greater at the severe decline location than at the slight decline and healthy locations. In contrast, CA was greatest at the healthy location and least at the severe decline location. MT correlated with the values obtained from a linear trinomial function that included EW, CA, and US as variables (r = 0.872, P &lt; 0.01), and US correlated with amounts of Sb in aerosols (r = 0.939, P &lt; 0.01). Therefore, it is likely that the deterioration of epicuticular wax and stomatal unhealthiness resulting mainly from clogging with aerosols, in combination with environmental aridification, have placed C. japonica under chronic and sometimes fatal water stress, causing tree decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicSeedling growth and survival studiesFrench-language works237,207