Morphological and molecular data to determine the origin and taxonomic status of<i>Prosopis chilensis</i>var.<i>riojana</i>(Fabaceae, Mimosoideae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyzes the morphological and genetic characteristics of three sympatric populations of Prosopis from Argentina. Although morphological and geographical data suggest that Prosopis chilensis var. riojana is an interspecific hybrid of Prosopis chilensis var. chilensis and Prosopis flexuosa var. flexuosa, no correlation was found between morphological traits and genetic distances generated by random amplified polymorphic DNA - polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). Genetic similarity is greater among P. chilensis var. chilensis and P. flexuosa var. flexuosa than between either of these two taxa with P. chilensis var. riojana. Also, P. chilensis var. riojana has unique genetic markers that are absent from its putative parents. Additionally, dendrograms generated by unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) and Neighbor-Joining clustering criteria group P. chilensis var. chilensis and P. flexuosa var. flexuosa apart from P. chilensis var. riojana. Possibilities for the lack of congruence between morphology and RAPD markers are discussed. The results obtained are insufficient to conclusively establish the origin of P. chilensis var. riojana; however, the morphological and genetic traits observed suggest this taxon is well differentiated from P. chilensis var. chilensis and P. flexuosa var. flexuosa.Key words: genetic distances, hybridization, morphology, Prosopis, RAPD, rare taxon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".