Sociodemographic characteristics, care, feeding practices, and growth of cohorts of children born to HIV‐1 seropositive and seronegative mothers in Nairobi, Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVES To compare sociodemographic profiles, child care, child feeding practices and growth indices of children born to HIV-1 seropositive and seronegative mothers. METHODS: A cohort study of 234 children (seropositive and seronegative) born to HIV-1 seropositive mothers and 139 children born to seronegative mothers in Pumwani Maternity Hospital which serves a low-income population in Nairobi, Kenya from December 1991 and January 1994. RESULTS: With few exceptions, at the time of their birth children in all three cohorts had parents with similar characteristics, lived in similar housing in similar geographical areas, had their mothers as their primary care givers, had similar feeding practices and similar growth status and patterns. However, the HIV-1 seropositive mothers were slightly younger (23.8 years vs. 25.0 years, P < 0.01), if married they were less likely to be their husband's first wife (79% vs. 91%, P = 0.02) and more likely to have a one-room house (75% vs. 63%, P = 0.04). All three cohorts had mean Z-scores in length-for-age and in weight-for-height within the normal range (>/= 2.0 Z-scores) from birth to 21 months with the exception of the length-for-age of the seropositive children at the 18-month visit. In all cohorts length-for-age became more compromised than weight-for-length, dropping to about -1.45 Z-score by 21 months; in contrast, weight-for-length dropped to about -0.5 Z-score by this age. The only statistically significant differences in growth indices among the three cohorts were between the two cohorts of seronegative children: those with seronegative mothers were less compromised in length-for-age at 1.5 months (mean Z-score = -0.19 vs. -0.48, P < 0.05) and more compromised in weight-for-length at 6 months (mean Z-score = 0.10 vs. 0.45, P < 0.05) and at 18 months (mean Z-score = -0.73 vs. -0.16, P < 0.05). 27-34% were exclusively breastfed at 1.5 months; 52-61% consumed solid foods in addition to breast milk by 2.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Low-income HIV-1 seropositive- and seronegative-born children were from families with similar characteristics and similar housing environments. Similar growth patterns in the cohorts suggest that the challenging environment and the choice of weaning foods had an impact on all three cohorts. The aggressive care given the children with HIV-1 seropositive mothers and their children may have reduced the progression and impact of HIV-1 disease on the growth of the seropositive children. Further research is needed to corroborate our findings to be certain that our results are not affected by loss to follow-up bias: we lost the same proportion in all three cohorts but cannot verify that the children we lost had the same growth patterns as those who remained in the study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".