Pamidronate in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Histomorphometric Effects of Long-Term Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Intravenous pamidronate treatment is beneficial to children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), but the effects of prolonged therapy are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of long-term pamidronate treatment on the bone tissue of children and adolescents with OI. DESIGN: This is an observational study on OI patients receiving iv pamidronate for more than 4 yr. SETTING: The study was carried out in a pediatric metabolic bone research unit. PATIENTS: Patients were 25 moderately to severely affected OI patients (seven girls) aged 1.4-15.3 yr at baseline. INTERVENTION: Intervention was cyclical iv pamidronate at a dose of 9 mg/kg.yr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Iliac bone biopsy and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures were obtained at treatment start, after 2.7 +/- 0.5 yr (mean +/- sd), and after 5.5 +/- 0.7 yr of therapy. RESULTS: Average areal bone mineral density increased by 72% in the first half of the observation period, but by only 24% in the second half. Mean cortical width and cancellous bone volume increased by 87 and 38%, respectively, between baseline and the first time point during treatment (P < 0.001 for all changes). Thereafter, cortical width did not change significantly, but there was a trend (P = 0.06) toward higher cancellous bone volume. Average bone formation rate on trabecular surfaces decreased by 70% after pamidronate treatment was initiated and showed a trend (P = 0.08) toward a further decline in the second part of the study interval. CONCLUSION: The gains that can be achieved with pamidronate treatment appear to be largely realized in the first 2-4 yr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".