Brain tumor cell lines resistant to <i>O</i>6-benzylguanine/1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea chemotherapy have <i>O</i>6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase mutations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemotherapeutic activity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU or carmustine) may be improved by the addition of O6-benzylguanine (O6-BG). The reaction of O6-BG with O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) prevents the repair of O6-chloroethyl lesions caused by BCNU. In clinics, the combination of O6-BG and BCNU is now being tested for the treatment of brain tumors. However, the effectiveness of this drug regimen may be limited by drug resistance acquired during treatment. To understand the possible mechanisms of resistance of brain tumor cells to the O6-BG/BCNU combination, we generated medulloblastoma cell lines (D283 MED, D341 MED, and Daoy) resistant to the combination of O6-BG and BCNU [O6-BG/BCNU resistant (OBR)]. DNA sequencing showed that all of the parent cell lines express wild-type AGTs, whereas every OBR cell line exhibited mutations that potentially affected the binding of O6-BG to the protein as evidenced previously by in vitro mutagenesis and structural studies of AGT. The D283 MED (OBR), Daoy (OBR), and D341 MED (OBR) cell lines expressed G156C, Y114F, and K165T AGT mutations, respectively. We reported previously that rhabdomyosarcoma TE-671 (OBR) also expresses a G156C mutation. These data suggest that the clonal selection of AGT mutants during treatment with O6-BG plus an alkylator may produce resistance to this intervention in clinical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".