Pyrolysis of 2-methoxy-5,5-dimethyl-2-methylthio- 2,5-dihydro[1,3,4]oxadiazole studied with photoelectron spectroscopy and DFT calculations He(I) photoelectron spectrum of methoxy(methylthio)carbene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gas-phase pyrolysis of 2-methoxy-2-methylsulfanyl-5,5-dimethyl-2,5-dihydro[1,3,4]oxadiazole (1) (also known as 2-methoxy-5,5-dimethyl-2-methylthio-2,5-dihydro[1,3,4]oxadiazole and 2-methoxy-2-methylthio-5,5-dimethyl-Δ3-l,3,4-oxadiazoline) in the source of an UV photoelectron spectrometer, by means of a CW CO2 laser as directed heat source, gave a photoelectron (PE) spectrum that included ionization bands belonging to acetone and methoxy(methylthio)carbene (3). Photoelectron spectra of authentic samples of (E)-1,2-dimethoxy-1,2-dimethyl thioethene (4), (Z)-1,2-dimethoxy-1,2-dimethylthioethene (5), S-methyl thioethanoate (6), and O-methyl ethanethioate (7), which can be derived by dimerization and rearrangement of the carbene, established that these compounds are not present in the pyrolysate. DFT calculations at the B3PW91/6-31+G(d,p) level and simulation of PE spectra at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level were instrumental in the interpretation of the experimental results. From the available experimental and calculated data, 3 is formed in a Sickle conformation upon pyrolysis of 1. Transition states for the rearrangement of 3 were examined with QTAIM. Key words: 2-methoxy-5,5-dimethyl-2-methylthio-2,5-dihydro[1,3,4]oxadiazole, pyrolysis, He(I) photoelectron spectroscopy, methoxy(methylthio)carbene, DFT calculations, QTAIM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".