MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114973749 · doi:10.1071/rd12259

Claudin-8 expression in Sertoli cells and putative spermatogonial stem cells in the bovine testis

2013· article· en· W2114973749 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mary McMillan, Nicholas M. Andronicos, Rhonda Davey, Sally Stockwell, Geoffrey Hinch, Sabine Schmoelzl

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsSertoli cellCell sortingCell biologyBiologyStem cellCell adhesion moleculeFluorescein isothiocyanateEmbryonic stem cellMolecular biologyCell adhesionCellSpermatogenesisFlow cytometryGeneGeneticsEndocrinologyFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adhesion molecules are expressed by both adult and embryonic stem cells, with different classes of adhesion molecules involved in cell-membrane and intercellular contacts. In this study the expression of the adhesion molecule claudin-8 (CLDN8), a tight-junction protein, was investigated as a potential marker for undifferentiated spermatogonia in the bovine testis. We found that CLDN8 was expressed by both spermatogonia and a subset of Sertoli cells in the bovine testis. We also showed co-expression of GFRα1 in testis cells with CLDN8 and with Dolichos biflorus agglutinin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (DBA-FITC) staining. We observed co-enrichment of spermatogonia and CLDN8-expressing Sertoli cells in DBA-FITC-assisted magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), an observation supported by results from fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, which showed CLDN8-expressing cells were over-represented in the MACS-positive cell fraction, leading to the hypothesis that CLDN8 may play a role in the spermatogonial stem-cell niche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207