First Experimental Constraint on the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>Reaction Cross Section at Astrophysical Energies via the Coulomb Dissociation of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The radionuclide $^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$ has been of great interest to the nuclear astrophysics community for over a decade. An initial discrepancy between the observed and modeled Galactic $^{60}\mathrm{Fe}/^{26}\mathrm{Al}$ ratio motivated numerous studies focused on the nucleosynthesis of these two isotopes, though the cross section of the primary astrophysical production reaction, $^{59}\mathrm{Fe}(n,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$, has remained purely theoretical. The present work offers a first experimental constraint on the $^{59}\mathrm{Fe}(n,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{60}\mathrm{Fe}$ cross section at astrophysical energies, obtained indirectly via Coulomb dissociation, and demonstrates that the theoretical reaction rates used in present stellar models are not highly erroneous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.743 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".