Factorial experimental design for graft copolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate onto styrene–butadiene rubber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The graft copolymerization of styrene (ST) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) onto styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) latex prepared by seeded emulsion polymerization has been studied under various reaction conditions using cumene hydroperoxide redox initiator. The mechanism of graft copolymerization has been investigated. The synthesized graft copolymers were purified and then characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) analysis. A 2 2 fractional factorial experimental design was applied to study the effects of the process variables such as the amount of initiator and emulsifier, the presence or absence of chain‐transfer agent, ST to MMA ratio, monomer to rubber ratio, and reaction temperature on the grafting efficiency. The analysis of the results from the design showed the sequence of the main effect on the observed response of the grafting of ST and MMA onto SBR and that the amount of chain‐transfer agent had a significant effect. Transmission electron microscopy was used to study the morphology of the graft copolymers. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2867–2874, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".