MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115012080 · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-03-0241

Sec22b Is a Negative Regulator of Phagocytosis in Macrophages

2009· article· en· W2115012080 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kiyotaka Hatsuzawa, Hitoshi Hashimoto, Hiromi Hashimoto, Seisuke Arai, Taku Tamura, Arisa Higa-Nishiyama, Ikuo Wada

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology of the Cell · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceLife Science Foundation of JapanMcGill University
KeywordsPhagocytosisPhagosomeBiologyCell biologyEndoplasmic reticulumSyntaxinRegulatorMembrane proteinMembraneBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is proposed to be a membrane donor for phagosome formation. In support of this, we have previously shown that the expression level of syntaxin 18, an ER-localized SNARE protein, correlates with phagocytosis activity. To obtain further insights into the involvement of the ER in phagocytosis we focused on Sec22b, another ER-localized SNARE protein that is also found on phagosomal membranes. In marked contrast to the effects of syntaxin 18, we report here that phagocytosis was nearly abolished in J774 macrophages stably expressing mVenus-tagged Sec22b, without affecting the cell surface expression of the Fc receptor or other membrane proteins related to phagocytosis. Conversely, the capacity of the parental J774 cells for phagocytosis was increased when endogenous Sec22b expression was suppressed. Domain analyses of Sec22b revealed that the R-SNARE motif, a selective domain for forming a SNARE complex with syntaxin18 and/or D12, was responsible for the inhibition of phagocytosis. These results strongly support the ER-mediated phagocytosis model and indicate that Sec22b is a negative regulator of phagocytosis in macrophages, most likely by regulating the level of free syntaxin 18 and/or D12 at the site of phagocytosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology of the CellSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207