Asymmetrical Hybridities: Youths at Francophone Games in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this ethnographic comparative study of the Jeux de l’Acadie, the Jeux\nfranco-ontariens and the Alberta Francophone Games is to explore further how minority youth\nidentities are produced and manifested in Canada’s francophonies. Through interviews, drawings\nand questionnaires adolescents express and give meaning to their francophoneness in the context\nof the Games. The analysis reveals that francophone identities are reproduced as a component of\nhybrid identities. This hybridity refers to youths’ integration of once distinct francophone and\nanglophone cultural identities into a “hybrid” identity. This paper examines the different\nconfigurations of these hybrid cultural and linguistic identities, where some youths spontaneously\nand mostly live in French but insist on their hybridity, while other youths perform predominantly\nas anglophones but remain attached to their francophoneness. Indeed, Acadian youths primarily\nperform a singular francophone identity while Franco-Ontarian and Alberta francophone youths\nmanifest a rather complex and asymmetrical mélange of francophoneness and anglophoneness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".