Daily and seasonal dynamics of airborne spores of <i>Fusarium graminearum</i> and other <i>Fusarium</i> species sampled over wheat plots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spores were sampled during 2 years over wheat plots at Ottawa, Ontario. Plots were treated with corn colonized with Gibberella zeae (Schwein.) Petch (anamorph Fusarium graminearum Schwabe). In 1994, viable spores were sampled with four Burkard high-throughput jet samplers. Gibberella zeae ascospores were recovered mostly at night and showed four main release events during the 20-day sampling period, 1-3 days after rain events. Highest density of G. zeae spores (1500 spores/m 3 ) were sampled 1.5 m away from the inoculum source, with fewer spores 5 m away. Recovery of otherFusarium species was sporadic. For all species, there were no statistical differences among the daily sampling times, although for most species, morning counts were the lowest. Other Fusarium species detected, in decreasing order of spore density, were F. crookwellense, F. sporotrichioides, F. moniliforme, F. equiseti, F. subglutinans, and F. culmorum. Most spore release events did not correlate with rainfall events. In 1995, a Burkard continuous 7-day spore sampler was used to investigate the release of ascospores and macroconidia of G. zeae. Ascospores, but not macroconidia, showed a daily periodicity. Daily average densities of macroconidia were an order of magnitude less than ascospores. Ascospore release was correlated with rainfall events and the time of day.Key words: spore sampling,Gibberella zeae, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium sp. ascospores, macroconidia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".