MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115162015 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v3n12p177

Implementation and evaluation of a mental health program for Ni Vanuatu nurses

2013· article· en· W2115162015 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sue Webster, Jane Allnutt, Pauline Boss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Government
KeywordsMental healthNursingCompetence (human resources)Journaling file systemMental health nursingStaffingNurse educationPsychologyMedicineMedical educationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This is a case study, examined in order to understand the issues associated with implementing a mental health nursing program in Vanuatu . The participant was a registered nurse identified as leader in nursing practice, with advanced knowledge and skills in mental health for his role in Vanuatu. This paper also explores the perceptions and experiences of the participant as part of his preparation for mental health education. Method: U sing a case study design, quantitative data was collected using semi-structured interviews and researcher journaling. Data were analysed using an inductive thematically approach. Mixed methods and concurrent data analysis contributed to the rigor of this study. Results: A Ni Vanuatu nurse (Fellow) was sponsored by t he Australian Government Overseas Aid Program (AusAID) Fellowship to participate in a short-term , non-award study program of mental health theory and practice over 18 weeks in the Australian setting. The program enabled him to join 2nd year undergraduate nursing students undertaking the core Mental Health Unit at ACU. The findings indicate that the Fellow valued the opportunity to practice mental health nursing activities in a supervised and mentored environment that promoted active learning for developing clinical competence and increased confidence in mental health practice. Of particular value was the ability to undertake a range of clinical attachment opportunities that would not have been possible in Vanuatu. Conclusion: Vanuatu has a significant and identified deficit in mental health services , with little funding, infrastructure, resources or staffing allocated. The relevance of the introduction of this program, in a country where nursing education still takes place at certificate level, where there was little understanding of mental health conditions and interventions and where there were no real opportunities for clinical attachment or mentorship, cannot be understated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.645
Teacher spread0.480 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207