An Efficient Low-Complexity Detector for Spatially Multiplexed MC-CDM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel suboptimum detection method for spatially multiplexed multicarrier code division multiplexing (SM-MC-CDM) communications. Compared to the spatially multiplexed OFDM (SM-OFDM), the frequency domain spreading in SM-MC-CDM systems results in an additional diversity gain. To take advantage of diversity and multiplexing while mitigating interference, we design a low complexity efficient detector called unified successive interference cancellation (SIC) detector for SM-MC-CDM communications. Further performance improvement is achieved by adopting in conjunction with the unified SIC the iterative subcarrier reconstruction-detection algorithm originally proposed for single antenna systems. The results demonstrate significant performance improvement over other existing methods of comparable complexity. A close approximation for the probability density function (pdf) of the proposed detector's output signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) is found and used to obtain error bounds for the bit error rate (BER). Performance of the coded SM-MC-CDM transmission is also discussed in the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".