MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115170659 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2048208

An Efficient Low-Complexity Detector for Spatially Multiplexed MC-CDM

2010· article· en· W2115170659 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Eslami, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplexingDetectorOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceSubcarrierSingle antenna interference cancellationBit error rateElectronic engineeringInterference (communication)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)AlgorithmDiversity gainFrequency-division multiplexingFadingTelecommunicationsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel suboptimum detection method for spatially multiplexed multicarrier code division multiplexing (SM-MC-CDM) communications. Compared to the spatially multiplexed OFDM (SM-OFDM), the frequency domain spreading in SM-MC-CDM systems results in an additional diversity gain. To take advantage of diversity and multiplexing while mitigating interference, we design a low complexity efficient detector called unified successive interference cancellation (SIC) detector for SM-MC-CDM communications. Further performance improvement is achieved by adopting in conjunction with the unified SIC the iterative subcarrier reconstruction-detection algorithm originally proposed for single antenna systems. The results demonstrate significant performance improvement over other existing methods of comparable complexity. A close approximation for the probability density function (pdf) of the proposed detector's output signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) is found and used to obtain error bounds for the bit error rate (BER). Performance of the coded SM-MC-CDM transmission is also discussed in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207