MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115348911 · doi:10.5539/mas.v6n12p13

Effect of Organic Fertilizer on CO2, CH4 and N2O Emissions in a Paddy Field

2012· article· en· W2115348911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pantawat Sampanpanish

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of the Higher Education CommissionChulalongkorn University
KeywordsFertilizerOrganic fertilizerAgronomyMethaneCarbon dioxideEnvironmental scienceNitrous oxidePaddy fieldManureCow dungField experimentChemistryAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study on the effect of organic fertilizer (cow manure) on carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in a paddy field was conducted. Suphanburi 1 rice varieties were planted in a double-crop organic rice field at Pathum Thani Rice Research Center, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand. The study was categorized into 4 sets of experiments as follows: 1) control, without added fertilizer, 2) addition of organic fertilizer (cow manure) at 3.13 t·ha-1, 3) addition of organic fertilizer at 9.38 t·ha-1 and 4) addition of organic fertilizer at 12.50 t·ha-1. The study showed that the set with the addition of organic fertilizer at 12.50 t·ha-1 had the highest emissions rate of methane at an average rate of 4.94 mg·m-2 d. Lower methane emissions were found in the sets with added organic fertilizer at 9.38 t·ha-1 and in the control set without added fertilizer and the set with added organic fertilizer at 3.13 t·ha-1, with an average emission rate of 3.08, 1.77 and 1.49 mg·m-2·d, respectively. The differences in the methane emissions of all of the sets are statistically significant, (P<0.05). Compared to the other sets, the carbon dioxide emissions were highest in the set with added organic fertilizer at 9.38 t·ha-1, at an average rate of 380.55 mg·m-2·d. The rates were lower in the set with added organic fertilizer at 3.13 t·ha-1, the control set without added fertilizer, and the set with the addition of organic fertilizer at 12.50 t·ha-1, with emission rates of 325.24, 253.92 and 198.16 mg·m-2 d, respectively. However, these results had no significant difference. Meanwhile, the nitrous oxide emissions during the growing season of the rice were the highest in the set with the addition of organic fertilizer at 9.38 t·ha-1, which had an average rate of 1.41 mg·m-2·d. The rate was lower in the control set without added fertilizer, the set with added organic fertilizer at 3.13 t·ha-1, and the set with added organic fertilizer at 12.50 t·ha-1 with average emissions rates of 1.10, 1.40 and 0.60 mg·m-2·d, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207