Renal Sympathetic Nerves do not Modulate Renal Responses to Haemorrhage in Conscious Lambs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate the renal responses to hypotensive haemorrhage early in life and the role of renal sympathetic nerves in modulating these renal responses. To this end, experiments were carried out in conscious, chronically instrumented lambs with either intact renal nerves (n = 7, Intact) or bilateral renal denervation performed at the time of surgery (n = 5, Denervated). Parameters of renal function were measured before and after 20% haemorrhage (experiment 1) and 0% haemorrhage (experiment 2), the latter serving as a time control. The two experiments were performed in random order at intervals of 24-48 h. Within 20 min of hypotensive haemorrhage in intact lambs, glomerular filtration rate decreased by approximately 60%; this response was not altered by renal denervation. Since renal plasma flow remained constant after haemorrhage, the filtration fraction also decreased. After 20% haemorrhage, urinary flow rate decreased in intact lambs; this response was also not altered by renal denervation. Excretion rates of Na+ and K+ as well as urinary osmolality and free water clearance were not altered by haemorrhage in either intact or denervated lambs. These data provide the first description of renal responses to haemorrhage early in life. In addition, the present findings provide new information that renal responses to haemorrhage early in life do not appear to be modulated by renal sympathetic nerves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".