The Politics of Non-Translation: A Case Study in Anglo-Portuguese Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Politics of Non-Translation: A Case Study in Anglo-Portuguese Relations — One of the most fruitful paths opened up by the functionalist, target-oriented, turn in the study of the translation has been the possibility of taking into theoretical and analytical account objects that are epistemologically identifiable as being empirically absent. Non-translation, both at a lexical or a textual level, becomes thus available for research. In this context, the present paper has a double purpose: to describe a set of non-translation categories and to discuss a case of ideologically driven absence of translation. This case study concerns an intriguing episode in Shakespeare reception in Portugal: the almost complete lack of new translations from Shakespeare's works into the last decade of the nineteenth century following a fifteen-year period of intense translational activity and unprecedented popularity enjoyed by Shakespeare in the target culture. It was found that such a striking instance of non-translation was due to a nation-wide wave of anti-British nationalism that swept the country in the wake of colonial rivalry over a portion of territory in Southern Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".