Design of bilateral Switched Reluctance linear generator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presented the design objective of three-phase 6/4 structure long-mover bilateral Switched Reluctance linear generator. The structure, the main design parameters include air gap length, unit stator poles numbers, mover poles numbers, mover tooth width, stator tooth width, mover polar distance, stator polar distance, mover width, stator width, mover slot depth, stator slot depth, mover yoke height, stator yoke height and stator unit length are described. The calculation method of electric load and magnetic load are also given. The selection methods and the calculation methods of the main design parameters are also presented. The design procedure and example of a developed prototype with rated output power 200 W, rated velocity 2 m/s, and output voltage for windings 24V are given. The design of Switched Reluctance linear generator is accomplished by analogy analysis between Switched Reluctance rotary generator. The length of air gap of the Switched Reluctance linear generator is bigger than that of Switched Reluctance rotary generator. The mover yoke height in bilateral Switched Reluctance linear generator is twice as same as that in unilateral Switched Reluctance linear generator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".