High-fat diet results in postprandial insulin resistance that involves parasympathetic dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different diets have distinct impacts on glucose homoeostasis, for which insulin sensitivity (IS) after a meal (postprandial IS) is highly relevant. Postprandial IS depends upon hepatic parasympathetic activation and glutathione content elevation. We tested the hypothesis that postprandial IS is compromised in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a standard diet (STD, n 10), 1-week HFD (n 9) or 4-week HFD (n 8). IS was tested in postprandial state using the rapid IS test (RIST) before and after the blockade of the parasympathetic nerves (atropine, 1 mg/kg); parasympathetic-dependent IS was obtained from the difference between control and post-atropine RIST. Fasting IS was also assessed in the STD-fed rats (n 4) and 4-week HFD-fed rats (n 3) using the RIST. Whole-body fat and regional fat pads were heavier in the 1-week HFD-fed rats (79.8 (SE 7.9) and 23.7 (SE 1.0) g, respectively) or 4-week HFD-fed rats (106.5 (SE 6.1) and 30.1 (SE 1.4) g, respectively) than in the STD-fed rats (32.5 (SE 3.7) and 13.7 (SE 1.0) g, respectively; P < 0.001). Fasted-state IS was similar between the groups studied. Postprandial IS was higher in the STD-fed rats (185.8 (SE 5.6) mg glucose/kg body weight (bw)) than in both the 1-week HFD-fed rats (108.8 (SE 2.9) mg glucose/kg bw; P < 0.001) and 4-week HFD-fed rats (69.3 (SE 2.6) mg glucose/kg bw; P < 0.001). Parasympathetic-dependent IS was impaired in both HFD-fed groups (STD, 108.9 (SE 3.9) mg glucose/kg bw; 1-week HFD, 38.6 (SE 4.2) mg glucose/kg bw; 4-week HFD, 5.4 (SE 1.7) mg glucose/kg bw; P < 0.001). Total (postprandial) and parasympathetic-dependent IS correlated negatively with whole-body fat (R² 0.81 and 0.87) and regional adiposity (R² 0.85 and 0.79). In conclusion, fat accumulation induced by HFD is associated with postprandial insulin resistance, but not with fasting insulin resistance. HFD-associated postprandial insulin resistance is largely mediated by impairment of parasympathetic-dependent insulin action, which correlates with adiposity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".