Design and syntheses of diarylisoxazoles: Novel inhibitors of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) with analgesic‐antiinflammatory activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A group of 4,5‐diphenylisoxazoles ( 11a–p ), 3,4‐diphenyl‐5‐trifluoromethylisoxazoles ( 15, 21 ), and 4,5‐diphenyl‐3‐methylsulfonamidoisoxazole ( 23 ) possessing a variety of substituents (H, F, MeS, MeSO, MeSO 2 ) at the para ‐position of one of the phenyl rings were synthesized for evaluation as analgesic, and selective COX‐2 inhibitory antiinflammatory (AI), agents. Although the 4,5‐diphenylisoxazole group of compounds (11a–p) exhibited potent analgesic and AI activities, those compounds evaluated ( 11a, 11b, 11m ) were more selective inhibitors of COX‐1 than COX‐2, with the exception of 4‐(4‐methylsulphonylphenyl)‐5‐phenylisoxazole ( 11n ) that showed a modest COX‐2 selectivity index (SI) of 2.1. In contrast, 3‐(4‐methylsulphonylphenyl)‐4‐phenyl‐5‐trifluoromethylisoxazole ( 15 ), which retained good analgesic and AI activities, was a highly potent and selective COX‐2 inhibitor (COX‐1 IC 50 > 500 μM; COX‐2 IC 50 < 0.001 μM) with a COX‐2 SI of > 500,000, relative to the reference drug celecoxib (COX‐1 IC 50 = 22.9 μM; COX‐2 IC 50 = 0.0567 μM) with a COX‐2 SI of 404. The 3‐phenyl‐4‐(4‐methylsulphonylphenyl) regioisomer ( 21 ) was a less potent inhibitor (COX‐1 IC 50 = 252 μM; COX‐2 IC 50 = 0.2236 μM) with a COX‐2 SI of 1122, relative to the regioisomer ( 15 ). The related compound 4,5‐diphenyl‐3‐methylsulfonamidoisoxazole ( 23 ) exhibited similar (to 21 ) potency and COX‐2 selectivity (COX‐1 IC 50 > 200 μM; COX‐2 IC 50 = 0.226 μM) with an SI of 752. A molecular modeling (docking) study for the most potent, and selective, COX‐2 inhibitor (15) in the active site of the human COX‐2 enzyme showed the C‐5 CF 3 substituent is positioned 3.37 Å from the phenolic O H of Tyr 355 , and 6.91 Å from the Ser 530 O H. The S‐atom of the MeSO 2 substituent is positioned deep (7.40 Å from the entrance) inside the COX‐2 secondary pocket (Val 523 ). These studies indicate a C‐5 CF 3 ( 15, 21 ), or C‐3 NHSO 2 Me ( 23 ), central isoxazole ring substituent is crucial to selective inhibition of COX‐2 for this class of compounds. Drug Dev. Res. 51:273–286, 2000. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".