Life‐threatening hemolytic anemia due to an autoanti‐Pr cold agglutinin: evidence that glycophorin A antibodies may induce lipid bilayer exposure and cation permeability independent of agglutination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin of a 29-year-old man fell below 35 g/L over 5 days, despite 14 units of red blood cells (RBCs), due to an anti-Pr cold agglutinin (CA). His hemolytic anemia necessitated respiratory support in intensive care for 4 weeks. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The hemolysis was investigated by the effects on blood group-compatible RBCs of this anti-Pr and an anti-I CA and of a rabbit anti-human glycophorin A (GPA) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody on Ca(2+) permeability and of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) exposure. 1) The anti-Pr CA (in a plasmapheresis product from the patient) was absorbed and eluted from RBC ghosts and its immunophenotype was determined by agarose electrophoresis and immunofixation. 2) Ca(2+) permeability was measured by the response of Fluo-3-labeled RBCs to addition of external Ca(2+). 3) Exposed PE was measured with streptavidin-labeled biotinylated peptide Ro 09-0198 (cinnamycin). RESULTS: 1) The patient's anti-Pr CA was a polyclonal IgG. 2) The anti-Pr and the rabbit anti-human glycophorin IgG, but not an anti-I CA, rapidly increased Ca(2+)-dependent fluorescence upon addition of external Ca(2+) in a fraction (15%-25%) of RBCs that also became positive for cinnamycin. 3) Trypsin treatment of RBCs reduced the Ca(2+) influx due to the anti-Pr IgG, but neither trypsin nor neuraminidase changed the responses to the rabbit anti-human GPA IgG. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-Pr CA and rabbit anti-human GPA increased exposure of PE and increased membrane Ca(2+) permeability that may have caused hemolysis. The difference in the responses to these antibodies to enzyme treatment of RBCs suggests that they react with different epitopes on GPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".