MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A wavelet thresholding technique for local geoid and deflection of the vertical determination using a planar approximation

2007· article· en· W2115627442 on OpenAlexaff
M.M. El Habiby, Michael G. Sideris

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeoidThresholdingGeologyWaveletGeodesyPlanarVertical deflectionGeophysicsGeometryMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY A computational scheme using the wavelet transform is employed for local geoid determination, where wavelet multiresolution analysis (MRA) is introduced as an alternative approach to the well-established fast Fourier transform (FFT). The Stokes and Vening Meinesz integrals are approximated in finite MRA subspaces. The algorithm is built using an orthogonal wavelet base function. The characteristics of the base function and its effect on the final result are investigated. Hard and soft thresholding are tested in the compression of the kernel as well as global thresholding is compared to level-wise thresholding to optimize the compression level with an acceptable accuracy. Both global and level-wise thresholding are combined in order to achieve the maximum compression level, with acceptable geoid accuracy. The compression rate depends on the degree of singularity of the kernel. In the case of Stokes, a 94 per cent compression level is achieved with 1 cm (rms) accuracy in comparison to FFT and numerical integration approaches. Due to its stronger singularity, in the case of the Vening Meinesz kernel, 97 per cent compression rate is achieved with a 0.07 arc-second (rms) accuracy. The compression percentages achieved in this study are higher than those reported in pervious studies, which shows that this algorithm is very suitable for use in local geoid determination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207