Identification of oligopeptides mimicking the receptor-binding domain of Hantaan virus envelope glycoprotein from a phage-displayed peptide library
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attachment of enveloped viruses to cells is triggered by the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on envelope glycoproteins (GP) binding to receptors located on the cell surface. To date, recognized receptors and RBD of hantaan virus (HTNV) have not been exactly defined. In this study, one monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3G1 possessing high neutralizing activity, which is directed against HTNV envelope glycoprotein G2, was used to determine the crucial motif of RBD. Peptide ligands binding to MAb 3G1 were selected from a 12 amino acid peptide library displayed on filamentous phages. After 3 rounds of selection, the binding capacity between phages and MAb 3G1 was examined byELISA. Afterwards the positive phage clones with high binding activity to MAb 3G1 were chosen and sequenced. The peptide sequences of positive phage clones were compared with that of HTNV 76-118 strain G2. A motif Y/F/WPW(X)HX1-2HY, aligned to the primary sequences of G2 96YPWHTAKCHY105, was identified from the peptide inserts in the 9 positive clones. Positive phages and synthesized peptide containing the motif were bound significantly to virus-susceptible cell (Vero-E6) membranes by ELISA and immunofluorescence assay, respectively. Therefore, the sequence on G2 between amino acid 96 and 105 may be a key motif of HTNV RBD recognized by viral receptors on target cell membranes. Further characterization of the motif would provide useful information in understanding of the cellular entry of HTNV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".