MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115678028 · doi:10.1139/a10-007

A review on the removal of nitrogen oxides from polluted flow by bioreactors

2010· review· en· W2115678028 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hejingying Niu, Dennis Y.C. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioreactorData scrubbingNitrificationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryDenitrificationSelective catalytic reductionNitrogen oxidePollutantWet scrubberNitrogenWaste managementCombustionNitrogen dioxideOzoneEnvironmental engineeringChemistryPulp and paper industryCatalysisNOxFlue gasEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) are the main pollutants of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) released during a combustion process. They induce harmful effects both to the environment and human health, such as the formation of acid rain, an increase of the tropospheric ozone, global warming, etc. Selective catalytic reduction, selective non-catalytic reduction, adsorption and scrubbing (absorption) are the conventional technologies used to control NO x emission from exhaust gas. The bioreactor appears superior to conventional technologies in terms of simplicity and economy in operation, low process energy requirements, and easy treatment of residual products. This paper reviews two biologically-based NO x removal theories, i.e., nitrification and denitrification. The use of bacteria, fungi and microalgae are discussed and compared. The study indicates that the bioreactor is a promising technology that can be used to control NO x emitted during combustion processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207