Pediatric Laryngotracheal Reconstruction: Case Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Voice and Voice DisordersArticle1 Nov 2006Pediatric Laryngotracheal Reconstruction: Case Studies Shannon M. Theis, Nadine P. Connor, and J. Scott McMurrayMD Shannon M. Theis Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison, WI Google Scholar More articles by this author , Nadine P. Connor Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison, WI Google Scholar More articles by this author and J. Scott McMurray Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison, WI Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd16.3.20 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Baker, S., Kelchner, L., Weinrich, B., Lee, L., Willging, J. P., Cotton, R. T., et al. (in press). Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis and airway reconstruction: A review of voice outcomes, assessment, and treatment issues.Journal of Voice. Google Scholar Harvey, G. L. (1996). Treatment of voice disorders in medically complex children.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 282–291. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Hein, E. A., & Rutter, M. J. (2006). New perspectives in pediatric airway reconstruction.International Anesthesiology Clinics, 44(1), 51–64. Google Scholar Kertoy, M. (2002). Children with tracheostomies. Canada: Singular Publishing Group. Google Scholar Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M. S., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2003). Ventricular dysphonia: Clinical aspects and therapeutic options.Laryngoscope, 113, 859–866. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Smith, M. E., Marsh, J. H., Cotton, R. T., & Meyer, C. M. (1993). Voice problems after pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: Videolaryngostroboscopic, acoustic, and perceptual assessment.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 25, 173–181. Google Scholar Willging, J. P., & Cotton, R. T. (1995). Subglottic Stenosis in the Pediatric Patient.In C.M. Meyer,R.T. Cotton, & S.R. Shott (Eds.), The pediatric airway: An interdisciplinary approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott. Google Scholar Woodnorth, G. H. (2004). Assessing and managing medically fragile children: Tracheostomy and ventilatory support.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 363–372. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Zalzal, G. H., Choi, S. S., & Kantilal, M. (1997). Ideal timing of pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction.Archives of Otolaryngology, 123(2), 206–208. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 16Issue 3November 2006Pages: 20-23 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Nov 1, 2006 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".