MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115793706 · doi:10.1139/v06-025

Facile synthesis of α-<scp>D</scp>-Ara<i>f-</i>(1→5)-<scp>D</scp>-Gal<i>f</i>, the linker unit of the arabinan to the galactan in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>

2006· article· en· W2115793706 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lucía Gandolfi-Donadío, Carola Gallo‐Rodriguez, Rosa M. de Lederkremer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
KeywordsChemistryFuranoseStereochemistryArabinogalactanArabinoseGlycosylationGalactanSynthonLinkerPolysaccharideXyloseBiochemistryOrganic chemistryFermentationRing (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The arabinogalactan is a crucial constituent of the cell wall of mycobacteria. Both monosaccharides (arabinose and galactose) are found in the furanose configuration, absent in mammals. An efficient synthesis of α-D-Araf-(1→5)-D-Galf, the linker unit of the arabinan to the galactan, is described. The strategy relies on the use of a conveniently substituted D-galactono-1,4-lactone as a precursor of the reducing furanose ring. The glycosylation step was performed by the tin(IV) chloride promoted method using 1,2,3,5-tetra-O-benzoyl-α,β-D-arabinofuranose. The arabinose donor was obtained in a crystalline state in one step by benzoylation of arabinose in hot pyridine. Selective glycosylation of the exocyclic OH-5 was obtained in 75% yield to give 2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-D-arabinofuranosyl-(1→5)-2,6-di-O-pivaloyl-D-galactono-1,4-lactone. Reduction with disiamylborane gave the disaccharide synthon, useful for further glycosylations. Dec-9-enyl α-D-Araf-(1→5)-β-D-Galf, a convenient substrate for arabinofuranosyl transferases studies, was obtained by the trichloroacetimidate method of glycosylation.Key words: arabinofuranose, galactofuranose, Mycobacterium arabinogalactan, trichloroacetimidate, tin(IV) chloride.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207