MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115810764 · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.053805

Quasimode-projection approach to quantum-dot–photon interactions in photonic-crystal-slab coupled-cavity systems

2008· article· en· W2115810764 on OpenAlexaff
D. P. Fussell, Marc M. Dignam

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum dotPhotonHamiltonian (control theory)Quantum mechanicsPhotonic crystalSpontaneous emissionQuantum dynamicsQuantumLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a general quasimode formalism for the quantum treatment of quantum-dot--photon dynamics in coupled-cavity systems in photonic-crystal slabs. The coupled-cavity systems are characterized by a large number of discrete lossy nonorthogonal quasimodes that can be obtained using a combination of the finite-difference time-domain method and the tight-binding approach. We project the electric field Green tensor onto the quasimodes using a non-Hermitian projector and thereby avoid the prohibitive finite-difference time-domain calculation of the Green tensor in large systems. We extend our projection approach to show that the quantum dynamics can be derived from an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian that is the full Hamiltonian projected onto the quasimode basis. We demonstrate the equivalence of the effective Hamiltonian approach with the Green tensor approach for the case of spontaneous emission and show how it can be used to treat multiple-photon, multiple-dot dynamics. The effective Hamiltonian provides a systematic approach to treating interacting quantum-dot--photon dynamics in coupled-cavity systems with a moderate number of quantum dots and photons and can be easily generalized to include nonradiative decay and decoherence of the quantum dots. Finally, we use our approach to model spontaneous emission in an asymmetric two-cavity system in a photonic crystal slab. We show that results obtained using our approach are essentially identical to results using the full Green tensor in the weak-coupling regime. In the strong-coupling regime, we show that the spontaneous emission dynamics are strongly affected by the nonorthogonality of the quasimodes and the results can be easily understood in terms of the quasimode dressed states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207