Drought Stress Tolerance of Faba Bean as Studied by Morphological Traits and Seed Storage Protein Pattern
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eight economical Egyptian faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties had been evaluated under different drought stress levels and their seed storage protein content patterns under drought stress conditions had been studied and compared with pattern under normal conditions. Analysis of variance of the morphological trait revealed highly significant differences among both treatments and genotypes for the most of studied traits The susceptibility test for drought tolerance revealed that the variety ‘Giza 3’ showed the highest statistical significant susceptibility to drought stress and could be considered as susceptible variety for drought stress, while the variety ‘Giza 843’ was more tolerant to drought stress. Although ‘Giza 3’ variety gave the highest mean across all genotypes for the most of the morphological traits, it was the most drought susceptible variety. On the other hand, ‘Giza843’ gave medium mean across the genotypes but it was the most drought tolerant variety. Negative correlation between the morphological traits and the drought tolerance in faba bean. Using SDS-PAGE analysis, optical differences were obtained between the varieties ‘Giza 843’ (drought tolerant) and ‘Giza 3’ (drought susceptible) in their protein patterns. Many protein bands were obtained in the protein pattern of the variety ‘Giza 843’ that were not obtained in the protein pattern of the variety ‘Giza 3’ while some protein bands were observed in the protein pattern of the variety ‘Giza 3’ that were not present in the protein pattern of the variety ‘Giza 843’. Significant association could be observed between morphological traits and biochemical markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it