Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial DisordersArticle1 Oct 2003The Genetics of Huntington's Disease Ralph L. Shelton Ralph L. Shelton Tucson, AZ Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/ssod13.2.7 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Atkins, J. F. & Gesteland, R. (2002). The 22nd amino acid. Science, 296, 1409–1410. Google Scholar Faraone, S. V., Tsuang, M. T. & Tsuang, D. W. (1999). Genetics of mental disorders. New York: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar Fatt, H. V. & Griffin, J. R. (1983). Genetics for primary eye care practitioners. Chicago: The Professional Press. Google Scholar Mathy, P. (Presenter). (2003, April 30). Telerounds 67: Management of speech, language, and swallowing disorders in Huntington’s disease. Tucson, AZ: National Center for Neurogenic Communication Disorders, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona. Google Scholar Nussbaum, R. L., McInnes, R. R., & Willard, H. F. (2001). Thompson & Thompson genetics in medicine. (6th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Google Scholar Pawson, T., & Nash, P. (2003). Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science, 300, 445–452. Google Scholar Ridley, M. (1999). Genome. New York: Perennial of Harper Collins. Google Scholar Ridley, M. (2003). What makes you who you are. Time, 161, (22), 54–63. Google Scholar Service, R. F. (2000). Creation’s seventh day. Science, 289, 232–235. Google Scholar Shprintzen, R. J. (1997). Genetics, syndromes, and communication disorders. San Diego: Singular Publishing. Google Scholar Sperber, G. H. (2001). Craniofacial development. Hamilton, Ontario: B.C. Decker. Google Scholar University of Iowa. (2003). UI researchers selectively silence disease-causing gene. Retrieved May 27, 2003, from http://email.rdmag.com/cgi-bin7/DM/y/hTfL0DeJnw0DPf0cil0A2 Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 13Issue 2October 2003Pages: 7-12 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2003 Metrics Downloaded 17 times Topicsasha-sigsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2003 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".